Friday, July 1, 2011

Race and Culture: European Attiudes 1800-2000

                  In the years following the French Revolution, drastic shifts in the social and political paradigms of old world Europe would mark the end of centuries of monarchial rule and begin an age in which scientific discovery and industrial developments would give rise to modern Europe as it exists today. Throughout the period between 1800 and 2000, European attitudes toward Africans changed significantly in terms of perceptions of race and culture. The concept of scientific racism established the modern discipline of anthropology, increased the consciousness of racial superiority and conflict, and led to the creation of West African nationalism.
As the number of people of African descent decreased and the intermixing of African blood with European blood increased, the Negro-one of mixed racial backgrounds-replaced the perception of the African that had been prominent in the fifteenth through eighteenth centuries.  Driven by European imperialism during the nineteenth century, the exploration of the African continent and classification of the African culture produced a multitude of theories that aimed to identify the biological and social dynamics of race. “ From the sixteenth century on, the printed narratives of travelers…made Europeans increasingly aware of the extraordinary variety of humanity, of the existence of peoples differing greatly in their physical characteristics from the European norm, and of societies sharply distinguished one from another by their culture”.[1] Using these narratives, European scientists developed a larger vision of humanity, and sought not only to identify the differences between Africans and Europeans in physical appearances and in culture, but also to scientifically explain how these variations came about, “The European theorist found himself free to select ‘facts’ [from travel literature] that accorded best with his own preconceptions…to allow Europeans with an interest in the problems of race and culture to put forward a number of different theories…that helped to shape European actions in their contact with peoples of alien culture…and stimulate a mood of inquiry that contributed to the evolution of the modern discipline of anthropology”.[2]  In 1871, the Anthropological Institute was founded. The debate over human origins began and would facilitate the development of scientific racism.
                  The theories put forth by members of the Anthropological Institute suggested a system of racial superiority. “This concern with origins means that much of the study of Victorian racist theory has concentrated on the 1850s and ‘60s, when a fierce debate occurred between defenders of the orthodox theory of monogenesis and advocates of polygenesis. Both schools of thought followed he establishment practice of classifying varieties of man by racial type, and both assumed that a hierarchy of races existed with Europeans at the top of the scale”.[3] The polygenists, led by Robert Knox, further instituted the idea of European supremacy by claiming that Negros were of an entirely different species; this could be observed through the differences of physical characteristics, such as the slope of the forehead, which suggested a lower mental capacity. Additionally, it was due to the lack of intellectual ability that the Negro culture appeared to be savage, barbaric, and far less advanced when compared to European customs and traditions.  “ The polygenists found, then, an easy solution to the problem of physical and cultural variations: Negros represented a different species of humanity and could not reasonably be regarded as capable of the same achievements as Europeans”[4]
                  Seeking to expand their empires, European imperialist forces, such as Britain and France, began establishing settler colonies across the African continent.  “ From 1850 onwards, ‘race’, a term comparatively rarely used in the late eighteenth century, occurred ever more frequently in discussion on African and indeed global themes, and developed into a concept that provided an easy explanation of the two most remarkable phenomena of the age, the unprecedented rate of European technological development, and the equally unprecedented rate at which white people were expanding into every corner of the globe”.[5] European colonists used the theories put forth by members of the Anthropological institute to establish a code of conduct within their communities. The purpose of this was to not only implant and spread European culture within Africa, but also to protect the bloodline from being ‘contaminated’. Intermarriages, or the mixing of racial bloodlines, were a threat to European nationalism, which prided itself on the purity of its race. In addition, racial conflict would induce the instability of the empire. “In the Empire the realities of international rivalry and indigenous resistance to western imperialism forced the pace of formal colonization, and from the British perspective the problem was how to administer an established and expanding multiracial empire inhabited by peoples of exotic appearances and strange habits who were apparently unsuited to the advanced practices of Victorian civilization”.[6]
                  To solve this problem, the British began promoting the migration of West Africans, mostly male, to be formally educated in European culture. Many of these students had personally experienced European colonialism and continued to struggle against the confines of Negro second-class citizenship. “African students were often as much educated by the prevailing social conditions they found in Britain as they were by the formal education they received. Racism and prejudice…exacerbated by the rise of imperialism and the partition and conquest of Africa at the close of the nineteenth century…led Africans to form their own organizations and to combine with others in Britain to find ways to tackle common problems”.[7] The development of Pan-African organizations was a response not only to the injustices of imperialism but also to the ignorance of scientific racism. Members of these organizations laid the foundations or West African nationalism and independence.
                  The period between 1800 and 2000 coined the term “race” and gave birth to perhaps the most blatantly ignorant forms of prejudice and discrimination. Nineteenth century imperialism largely dictated the perception and attitudes of Europeans toward Africans and is the stimulus behind the development and institution of scientific racism.


[1] Halett, “Changing European Attitudes To Africa,” Cambridge Histories Online, (Cambridge University Press, 2008), 472-473.
[2] Ibid. 473-474
[3] Lormier, Douglas, “Theoretical Racism in Late-Victorian Anthropology, 1870-1900,” Victorian Studies, Vol. 31 (Indiana University Press, Spring 1988), 405.
[4] Halett, “Changing European Attitudes To Africa,” Cambridge Histories Online, (Cambridge University Press, 2008), 475.
[5] Ibid. 477
[6] Lormier, Douglas, “Theoretical Racism in Late-Victorian Anthropology, 1870-1900,” Victorian Studies, Vol. 31 (Indiana University Press, Spring 1988),430.
[7] Adi, Hakim, “Pan-Africansim and West African Nationalism in Britain,” African Studies Review, Vol. 43 (African Studies Association, April 2000), 72.
Bibliography
Halett, “Changing European Attitudes To Africa,” Cambridge Histories Online, (Cambridge University Press, 2008), 472-477.
Adi, Hakim, “Pan-Africansim and West African Nationalism in Britain,” African Studies Review, Vol. 43 (African Studies Association, April 2000), 72.
Lormier, Douglas, “Theoretical Racism in Late-Victorian Anthropology, 1870-1900,” Victorian Studies, Vol. 31 (Indiana University Press, Spring 1988), 405-430

No comments:

Post a Comment